Re: Client install id
2005-09-09 18:32:54
I could only find this on this APAR number you gave us.
It dos not talk about the 5.3 client
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=663&context=SSGSG7&dc=DB520&uid=swg21202145&loc=en_US&cs=UTF-8&lang=en
IC41440
Win (32)TSM 5.2.2.9 CLIENT ON WIN2003 SHOWS ALL FILES
"FAILED" IN ITS STATISTICS WHEN ANS1228E ERROR IS RECEIVED FOR
C:\ADSM.SYS
"It´s better to aim at perfection
and miss than it is to aim at imperfection and hit it"
Founder
Thomas J. Watson
|
|
Kær kveðja / Best regards,
Pétur
Eyþórsson · Tæknilegur ráðgjafi
eServer & Storage · Tivoli Advanced Storage Solutons Techical Expert
· MCSE · SNIA Professional ·
SNIA FC-SAN Practitioner · IBM C AIX S · TSM CP · TSRM
CP · TASS DP · IBM SAN P
Sími/tel: +354 569-7700 · GSM: +354 863-0560
www.nyherji.is
|
David W Litten <dlitten AT DUKE-ENERGY DOT COM>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
<ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
09.09.2005 22:20
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> |
|
To
| ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| Re: [ADSM-L] Client install
id |
|
APAR IC41440. Another alternative recommended by tivoli
support was to
backlevel the client to version 5.2.4.0
Andrew Raibeck
<storman AT US DOT IBM.C
OM>
To
Sent by: "ADSM:
ADSM-L AT vm.marist DOT edu
Dist Stor
cc
Manager"
<[email protected]
Subject
.edu>
Re: [ADSM-L] Client install
id
09/09/2005 06:03
PM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor
Manager"
<[email protected]
.edu>
David, do you happen to know to which APAR you are referring, or do you
have a PMR on this?
The closest match I know of is IC46809, but that describes the opposite
problem you mention: that when you DO use dynamic serialization, the
system state or system object backups are no good. But DYNAMIC and
SHRDYNAMIC should only be used on an exception basis, when you know that
the application that uses the files can tolerate a restored file that came
from a fuzzy backup.
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS
Internet e-mail: storman AT us.ibm DOT com
The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
"Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> wrote
on 2005-09-09
13:48:12:
> Larry,
>
> There are problems with Domain Controllers running 5.3 client, that
are
> supposed to be addressed by the 5.3.1 release, where system objects
don't
> get backed up unless the copy group they are using is set to
Dynamic
> serialization.
>
> As long as the ID you are using has local admin rights on the client
> machines you should not run into any problems with the install. Local
admin
> is required in order to give you update rights to the registry. Any
of
the
> ID's you've mentioned will work as long as they are in the local
> administrators group on the client machines.
>
> I have seen problems with other software installs if the built-in,
local
> Administrator ID is not used. But, I have not seen any issues when
> installing TSM with any id within the local Administrators group.
>
> david
>
>
>
>
> Larry Peifer
> <[email protected]
> CE.COM> To
> Sent by: "ADSM:
ADSM-L AT vm.marist DOT edu
> Dist Stor cc
> Manager"
> <[email protected]
Subject
> .edu>
[ADSM-L] Client
install id
>
>
> 09/09/2005 04:35
> PM
>
>
> Please respond to
> "ADSM: Dist Stor
> Manager"
> <[email protected]
> .edu>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> We're installing 90 TSM 5.3 clients on a mix of W2K and W2K3 servers.
> These are all new - 1st time installs. Several are domain controllers
and
> several are clustered for failover. Looks to me like
we have several
> choices for ID's to use for installs: Local Administrator ID, Domain
> Administrator ID, and members of the Administrator group. We
run
Journal,
> Schedule, and Web services. All passwords for all IDs mentioned
above
get
> changed every 90 days per Corporate IT Security mandate. What
pros /
cons
> are there for using a particular ID to install with?
|
|
|