This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C5D9FD.94FEFFA0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Thanks Dave,
Our projected size requirement will be upto 300 clients and 15T total full.
Most of our policies will be 1 full and six incremental per week. Assuming
20% change for incrementals we'd be looking about 5 - 7T per 8hr night
backup window. That'd be roughly 230MBps. Would one V440 be able to handle
this kind of throughput? The management has an argument that one V440 cost
more than three Windows boxes with similar (or better) speed. But if one
V440 can handle the load and more stable the argument would be stronger for
us.
cheers
Guang
-----Original Message-----
From: Cornely, David [mailto:David_Cornely AT intuit DOT com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 12:51 PM
To: 'veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu'
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] choice of master/media server platform
Well, I think it really depends on how much data you need to push to tape in
a given time frame and the growth you expect.
It is true that Sun leaves a bit to be desired in their rather low number of
high-speed buses (I suspect market forces determine that type of thing) but
if it meets your needs then I say stick with Sun. We use a number of v440's
for media servers and spec'd them to push about 12TB a day with 4-6 hours to
spare. This has been the case and the fiber connected drives we use operate
wonderfully in terms of speed across these buses.
I can say that in my experience tape drives in general are a lot less stable
on the Window's media servers that I've used, lots of ghost drives and
reboots are almost always part of fixing any little problem. Stick with a
Unix media server if at all possible.
-Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Behalf Of Guang Yu
Liu
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 19:00
To: 'veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu'
Subject: [Veritas-bu] choice of master/media server platform
Hi all,
I know there were some debates before regarding OS choices for NBU
but I'd like to ask one particular question. This was coming from an
external consultant.
Background: I am a Unix guys so normally are biased towards
stability/flexibility etc of *nix. But the consultant told us that since
backups are mainly using I/Os, the buses should be an important deciding
factor as well. He went out and found that even the most expensive of Sun
servers tend to have PCI buses with 66MHZ only (most with 33MHZ) and most of
the Intel boxes have 133MHZ PCI buses. He strongly suggested that we pick
Windows for that.
Your opinions?
many thanks
Guang
Macquarie Telecom - delivering value for business and government.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------
Confidentiality Note: This e-mail is sent to and intended for use by the
named addressees only.
It contains confidential information. If you receive this e-mail in error,
please telephone Macquarie
Telecom Pty Ltd on +612 8221 7777, and then delete this message immediately.
Further, you should
not re-transmit, copy, store, or reveal the contents of this message to any
third party.
Macquarie Telecom - delivering value for business and government.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------
Confidentiality Note: This e-mail is sent to and intended for use by the
named addressees only.
It contains confidential information. If you receive this e-mail in error,
please telephone Macquarie
Telecom Pty Ltd on +612 8221 7777, and then delete this message immediately.
Further, you should
not re-transmit, copy, store, or reveal the contents of this message to any
third party.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C5D9FD.94FEFFA0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<TITLE>choice of master/media server platform</TITLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1515" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE>@font-face {
font-family: Tahoma;
}
@page Section1 {size: 8.5in 11.0in; margin: 1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; }
P.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman"
}
LI.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman"
}
DIV.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman"
}
A:link {
COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlink {
COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline
}
A:visited {
COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {
COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline
}
P {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0in; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; FONT-FAMILY:
"Times New Roman"
}
SPAN.EmailStyle18 {
COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial
}
DIV.Section1 {
page: Section1
}
</STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY lang=EN-US vLink=purple link=blue>
<DIV><SPAN class=499481107-26102005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>Thanks
Dave,</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=499481107-26102005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>Our
projected size requirement will be upto 300 clients and 15T total full.
Most of our policies will be 1 full and six incremental per week. Assuming 20%
change for incrementals we'd be looking about 5 - 7T per 8hr night backup
window. That'd be roughly 230MBps. Would one V440 be able to handle this kind
of
throughput? The management has an argument that one V440 cost more than three
Windows boxes with similar (or better) speed. But if one V440 can handle the
load and more stable the argument would be stronger for us.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=499481107-26102005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=499481107-26102005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>cheers</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=499481107-26102005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2>Guang</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Cornely, David
[mailto:David_Cornely AT intuit DOT com]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, October
26, 2005
12:51 PM<BR><B>To:</B> 'veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT
edu'<BR><B>Subject:</B>
RE: [Veritas-bu] choice of master/media server platform<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV class=Section1>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT face=Arial color=navy size=2><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Well, I think it
really depends on how much data you need to push to tape in a given time
frame
and the growth you expect.</SPAN></FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT face=Arial color=navy size=2><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">It is true that Sun
leaves a bit to be desired in their rather low number of high-speed buses (I
suspect market forces determine that type of thing) but if it meets your
needs
then I say stick with Sun. We use a number of v440's for media servers
and spec'd them to push about 12TB a day with 4-6 hours to spare. This
has been the case and the fiber connected drives we use operate wonderfully
in
terms of speed across these buses.</SPAN></FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT face=Arial color=navy size=2><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY:
Arial"></SPAN></FONT> </P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT face=Arial color=navy size=2><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">I can say that in my
experience tape drives in general are a lot less stable on the Window's media
servers that I've used, lots of ghost drives and reboots are almost always
part of fixing any little problem. Stick with a Unix media server if at
all possible.</SPAN></FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT face=Arial color=navy size=2><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY:
Arial"></SPAN></FONT> </P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT face=Arial color=navy size=2><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY:
Arial">-Dave</SPAN></FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><FONT face=Arial color=navy size=2><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY:
Arial"></SPAN></FONT> </P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FONT face=Tahoma size=2><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma">-----Original
Message-----<BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">From:</SPAN></B>
veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] <B><SPAN
style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">On Behalf Of </SPAN></B>Guang Yu Liu<BR><B><SPAN
style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sent:</SPAN></B> Tuesday, October 25, 2005
19:00<BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To:</SPAN></B>
'veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu'<BR><B><SPAN
style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject:</SPAN></B> [Veritas-bu] choice of
master/media server platform</SPAN></FONT></P>
<P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FONT face="Times New Roman"
size=3><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt"></SPAN></FONT> </P>
<P style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Hi all,</SPAN></FONT>
<BR> <FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">I know there were some debates
before regarding OS choices for NBU but I'd like to ask one particular
question. This was coming from an external consultant.</SPAN></FONT></P>
<P style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt">
</SPAN></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Background: I am a Unix guys so
normally are biased towards stability/flexibility etc of *nix. But the
consultant told us that since backups are mainly using I/Os, the buses should
be an important deciding factor as well. He went out and found that even the
most expensive of Sun servers tend to have PCI buses with 66MHZ only (most
with 33MHZ) and most of the Intel boxes have 133MHZ PCI buses. He strongly
suggested that we pick Windows for that.</SPAN></FONT></P>
<P style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FONT face="Times New Roman" size=3><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt">
</SPAN></FONT><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Your opinions?</SPAN></FONT> </P>
<P style="MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">many thanks</SPAN></FONT>
<BR><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Guang</SPAN></FONT> <BR><FONT
face=Arial size=2><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Macquarie
Telecom - delivering value for business and government.</SPAN></FONT>
<BR><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY:
Arial">---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</SPAN></FONT>
<BR><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Confidentiality Note: This e-mail
is sent to and intended for use by the named addressees only.
</SPAN></FONT><BR><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">It contains confidential
information. If you receive this e-mail in error, please telephone Macquarie
</SPAN></FONT><BR><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Telecom Pty Ltd on +612 8221
7777,
and then delete this message immediately. Further, you should
</SPAN></FONT><BR><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">not re-transmit, copy, store, or
reveal the contents of this message to any third party.</SPAN></FONT> </P>
<P class=MsoNormal
style="MARGIN-BOTTOM: 12pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in"><FONT
face="Times New Roman" size=3><SPAN
style="FONT-SIZE:
12pt"><BR><BR></SPAN></FONT></P></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">Macquarie Telecom - delivering value for business
and government.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2
FACE="Arial">---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">Confidentiality Note: This e-mail is sent to and
intended for use by the named addressees only. </FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">It contains confidential information. If you
receive this e-mail in error, please telephone Macquarie </FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">Telecom Pty Ltd on +612 8221 7777, and then delete
this message immediately. Further, you should </FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2 FACE="Arial">not re-transmit, copy, store, or reveal the
contents of this message to any third party.</FONT></P>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C5D9FD.94FEFFA0--
|
