Re: [Networker] Multiple AFTD's -limitations?
2008-09-05 05:19:20
Hi Nick,
On 05/09/2008, at 19:03 , N.J.Tustain wrote:
Does anyone have experience of problems/limitations in networker when
using multiple AFTD's? Or other area's of consideration when
increasing
the number of AFTD's.
We presently use 3 on one SN and 4 on the other. We are considering
increasing this number by at least one on each, maybe more and will be
buying extra drives to accommodate with staging/clonning.
What you're planning shouldn't present any real problems, so long as
you have the bandwidth within the storage environment to accommodate
the additional disk backup units - e.g., if they're being presented
from a SAN, make sure that the SAN is going to be able to readily
support the additional disk backup units.
I've worked with plenty of sites with a much larger number of disk
backup units, both on the backup server and storage nodes, so there's
no limitations as such with the number you're looking at.
Cheers,
Preston.
--
Preston de Guise
"Enterprise Systems Backup and Recovery: A Corporate Insurance
Policy", due out September 17 2008:
http://www.crcpress.com/shopping_cart/products/product_detail.asp?sku=AU6396&isbn=9781420076394&parent_id=&pc=
http://www.enterprisesystemsbackup.com
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type
"signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to networker-request
AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this list. You can access the
archives at http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Networker] Multiple AFTD's -limitations?, N.J.Tustain
- Re: [Networker] Multiple AFTD's -limitations?,
Preston de Guise <=
- Re: [Networker] Multiple AFTD's -limitations?, N.J.Tustain
- Re: [Networker] Multiple AFTD's -limitations?, Eugene Vilensky
- [Networker] Tapes are labelled but not used, 0% appendable, Ali
- Re: [Networker] Tapes are labelled but not used, 0% appendable, Goslin, Paul
- Re: [Networker] Tapes are labelled but not used, 0% appendable, Davina Treiber
- Re: [Networker] Tapes are labelled but not used, 0% appendable, Ali
- Re: [Networker] Tapes are labelled but not used, 0% appendable, Preston de Guise
Re: [Networker] Multiple AFTD's -limitations?, Francis Swasey
|
|
|