Re: [Networker] Tapes are labelled but not used, 0% appendable
2008-09-05 12:27:07
Ali wrote:
Hi NW Gurus,
We find a number of Tapes (5 to 10 each day) in the library
that are labelled by NW but never written to. We noticed this recently and looks
like this has been happenning for quite sometime and we have been shipping 0%
appendable tapes offsite for 30 days upto 7 years . (I recommend you should also
keep an eye on it).
has anyone seen this ? our group parallelism is set
to 16 and Tape drives are LTO2 in ADIC i2K library on a NW 7.3.3 running on
Soalris 10 and another environment is Windows 2003 with same issue.
I can guess why NetWorker does this. It issues a mount request based on
the number of streams outstanding. It kicks of label/mount operations
for the appropriate number of tapes, but some operations take longer
than others. Before all the operations have completed some of the
smaller save sets have already finished so not all the tapes are needed.
These tapes get labelled and never used.
This should not cause a problem, as next time a tape is needed, the 0%
tape will get mounted, probably the next day. However if your procedures
for offsiting are so badly broken that they call for empty tapes to be
offsited this will never happen.
NetWorker is not at fault in this case, your procedures are. I suggest
you fix them, and also recall all the 0% tapes you have previously offsited.
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type
"signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to networker-request
AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this list. You can access the
archives at http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Networker] Multiple AFTD's -limitations?, N.J.Tustain
- Re: [Networker] Multiple AFTD's -limitations?, Preston de Guise
- Re: [Networker] Multiple AFTD's -limitations?, N.J.Tustain
- Re: [Networker] Multiple AFTD's -limitations?, Eugene Vilensky
- [Networker] Tapes are labelled but not used, 0% appendable, Ali
- Re: [Networker] Tapes are labelled but not used, 0% appendable, Goslin, Paul
- Re: [Networker] Tapes are labelled but not used, 0% appendable,
Davina Treiber <=
- Re: [Networker] Tapes are labelled but not used, 0% appendable, Ali
- Re: [Networker] Tapes are labelled but not used, 0% appendable, Preston de Guise
Re: [Networker] Multiple AFTD's -limitations?, Francis Swasey
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: [Networker] Tapes are labelled but not used, 0% appendable, Goslin, Paul |
Next by Date: |
Re: [Networker] Tapes are labelled but not used, 0% appendable, Ali |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: [Networker] Tapes are labelled but not used, 0% appendable, Goslin, Paul |
Next by Thread: |
Re: [Networker] Tapes are labelled but not used, 0% appendable, Ali |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|