Networker

Re: [Networker] Query in Staging from adv_file

2008-08-19 18:51:35
Subject: Re: [Networker] Query in Staging from adv_file
From: Preston de Guise <enterprise.backup AT GMAIL DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:47:53 +1000
On 20/08/2008, at 8:35 AM, Stan Horwitz wrote:

On Aug 19, 2008, at 6:16 PM, Curtis Preston wrote:

Well, that significantly decreases the value of AFTDs over VTLs in
NetWorker, now doesn't it?

I have no experience with a VTL, but my impression is that you get the same functionality as physical tape drives, but on disk. If so, doesn't that limit the amount of streams that can be read from a virtual tape to just one session at a time, or does it parlay the fact that multiple local tapes can be serviced concurrently in a VTL?


In theory it doesn't make AFTDs any worse than VTLs, since neither scenario supports more than one staging operating reading from the same volume at the same time.

However, in practice VTLs will normally be configured such that there are a high number of virtual tape drives and a high number of smaller sized virtual volumes, making it possible to execute more concurrent reads than either a conventional PTL or a AFTD.

I wouldn't however say that it significantly decreases the value of AFTDs over VTLs in NetWorker - it entirely depends on what your needs are. In an environment that requires high levels of recovery activities, AFTDs may still win out over VTLs - e.g., a previous customer of mine had a configuration that required 400-600+ recoveries per working day (i.e., an 8 hour period each day); in this sort of scenario AFTDs with their ability to allow as many concurrent recovery sessions as requested are of course King.

Cheers,

Preston.

--
Preston de Guise


"Enterprise Systems Backup and Recovery: A Corporate Insurance Policy", due out September 17 2008:

http://www.crcpress.com/shopping_cart/products/product_detail.asp?sku=AU6396&isbn=9781420076394&parent_id=&pc=

http://www.enterprisesystemsbackup.com

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type 
"signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to networker-request 
AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this list. You can access the 
archives at http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER