On 01/09/2017 01:55 PM, Timo Neuvonen wrote:

> I'm still wondering if this really is the
> simplest way of implementing the file storage?
> 
> What would I lose if I simply had only one of the two device resources, no
> autochanger resource at all, and the jobs would refer directly to the device
> resource? I think it should work too...

What are you trying to achieve? I agree that "virtual autochanger" is a
mind boggle with no obvious practical use, but why are you looking at it
in the first place? One file storage device is exactly how it works,
moreover it's the only way it works natively.

-- 
Dimitri Maziuk
Programmer/sysadmin
BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
Training and support from Colfax.
Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi

_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users