>>>>> On Fri, 09 May 2014 18:22:45 +0300, Jari Fredriksson said:
> 
> 08.05.2014 20:29, Mark kirjoitti:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Jari Fredriksson <jarif AT iki DOT fi
> > <mailto:jarif AT iki DOT fi>> wrote:
> >
> >     08.05.2014 15:12, Richard Fox kirjoitti:
> >     > Hi Jari & all,
> >     >
> >     > On Thu, 8 May 2014, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> >     >
> >     >> CentOS 6 has bacula 5.0.0 which has a bug so that it prunes
> >     jobs older
> >     >> than 43 years, no matter how it was defined for director.
> >
> >
> > I don't have an alternate repo to offer you, I just wanted to ask if
> > "43 years" is a typo, or if you really have retention times set that
> > go beyond that time frame?  More a curiosity than anything, I've
> > certainly heard of people with 7 or 10 year retentions, but you're
> > talking about it being an issue if jobs you run today get purged in
> > 2057?  Sorry, it just really piqued my interest because it's so far
> > out of any use cases I've heard of.
> >
> > Mark
> 
> I have Job retention set to 1 year. But Bacula 5.0.0 translates ANY
> value to
> 
> 09-May 07:03 wellington-dir JobId 423: Begin pruning Jobs older than 43
> years 4 months 19 days 4 hours 3 mins 39 secs.

I think it uses the correct retention, but it prints it incorrectly.

__Martin

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out:
&#149; 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity
&#149; Requirements for releasing software faster
&#149; Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users