08.05.2014 20:29, Mark kirjoitti:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Jari Fredriksson <jarif AT iki DOT fi
> <mailto:jarif AT iki DOT fi>> wrote:
>
>     08.05.2014 15:12, Richard Fox kirjoitti:
>     > Hi Jari & all,
>     >
>     > On Thu, 8 May 2014, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>     >
>     >> CentOS 6 has bacula 5.0.0 which has a bug so that it prunes
>     jobs older
>     >> than 43 years, no matter how it was defined for director.
>
>
> I don't have an alternate repo to offer you, I just wanted to ask if
> "43 years" is a typo, or if you really have retention times set that
> go beyond that time frame?  More a curiosity than anything, I've
> certainly heard of people with 7 or 10 year retentions, but you're
> talking about it being an issue if jobs you run today get purged in
> 2057?  Sorry, it just really piqued my interest because it's so far
> out of any use cases I've heard of.
>
> Mark

I have Job retention set to 1 year. But Bacula 5.0.0 translates ANY
value to

09-May 07:03 wellington-dir JobId 423: Begin pruning Jobs older than 43
years 4 months 19 days 4 hours 3 mins 39 secs.


-- 
jarif.bit

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out:
• 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity
• Requirements for releasing software faster
• Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce

_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users