Le Mer 6 juillet 2011 18:43, John Drescher a écrit :
> 2011/7/6 Jake Debord <jake.debord AT gmail DOT com>:
>> I have a machine I back up that when done averages:
>> Elapsed time: 41 mins 47 secs
>> Priority: 1
>> FD Files Written: 6,948
>> SD Files Written: 6,948
>> FD Bytes Written: 14,587,852,350 (14.58 GB)
>> SD Bytes Written: 14,589,273,339 (14.58 GB)
>> Rate: 5818.8 KB/s
>> Software Compression: 11.7 %
>>
>> Is this acceptable??? 6Mbps seems slow. I backup my machine and achieve
>> a
>> little better results
>>
>> Elapsed time: 3 mins 51 secs
>> Priority: 1
>> FD Files Written: 665
>> SD Files Written: 665
>> FD Bytes Written: 2,192,593,865 (2.192 GB)
>> SD Bytes Written: 2,192,728,783 (2.192 GB)
>> Rate: 9491.7 KB/s
>> Software Compression: 9.8 %
>>
>> Both of our Machines are almost identical in specs. I'm just wondering
>> if
>> this is typical or if there are tweeks to speeding things up. My setup
>> is
>> basically out of the box so not much extra done to it.
>>
>> I also use mysql for the database.
>>
>
> Are you using disk based volumes? If so try this with compression
> turned off. Also A Full backup will have a much higher rate than an
> Incremental or Differential because more of the time will be spent
> looking for the files to backup instead of backing up every file.
> Fragmentation of the client disk also plays a large part in backup
> rates.
>
> John
>
you could try an iperf for each machine o be sure all is ok with network
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
