Bacula-users

[Bacula-users] SPEED!

2011-07-06 12:35:20
Subject: [Bacula-users] SPEED!
From: Jake Debord <jake.debord AT gmail DOT com>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 11:31:28 -0500
I have a machine I back up that when done averages:
Elapsed time:           41 mins 47 secs
  Priority:               1
  FD Files Written:       6,948
  SD Files Written:       6,948
  FD Bytes Written:       14,587,852,350 (14.58 GB)
  SD Bytes Written:       14,589,273,339 (14.58 GB)
  Rate:                   5818.8 KB/s
  Software Compression:   11.7 %

Is this acceptable??? 6Mbps seems slow. I backup my machine and achieve a little better results
Elapsed time:           3 mins 51 secs
  Priority:               1
  FD Files Written:       665
  SD Files Written:       665
  FD Bytes Written:       2,192,593,865 (2.192 GB)
  SD Bytes Written:       2,192,728,783 (2.192 GB)
  Rate:                   9491.7 KB/s
  Software Compression:   9.8 %

Both of our Machines are almost identical in specs. I'm just wondering if this is typical or if there are tweeks to speeding things up. My setup is basically out of the box so not much extra done to it.
I also use mysql for the database.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security 
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes 
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>