On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 10:09:56AM -0400, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> should I use for my tables?" is MyISAM.[1]  At this point, wherever
> possible, EVERYONE should be using InnoDB.

I will, if the current backup ever finishes. For a start on MySQL 5.1
though (Debian squeeze). I am aware InnoDB has a more stable performance
according to the posts I have found in various bacula-mysql related
posts. Your post gives me some hope I can get away with converting the
table format instead of migrating to postgres. Simple for the fact I
have nicer backup scripts for mysql than for postgres.

> your MySQL configuration using MySQLtuner (free download from
> http://mysqltuner.com/mysqltuner.pl; requires Perl, DBI.pm, and DBD::mysql.)

I am using that one and tuning-primer.sh from http://www.day32.com/MySQL/

Regards,
        Adrian
-- 
LiHAS - Adrian Reyer - Hessenwiesenstraße 10 - D-70565 Stuttgart
Fon: +49 (7 11) 78 28 50 90 - Fax:  +49 (7 11) 78 28 50 91
Mail: lihas AT lihas DOT de - Web: http://lihas.de
Linux, Netzwerke, Consulting & Support - USt-ID: DE 227 816 626 Stuttgart

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security 
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes 
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users