Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Should I use data spooling when writing to nfs mounted storage?

2011-03-03 14:57:12
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Should I use data spooling when writing to nfs mounted storage?
From: Alan Brown <ajb2 AT mssl.ucl.ac DOT uk>
To: Fabio Napoleoni - ZENIT <fabio AT zenit DOT org>
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 19:53:51 +0000
Fabio Napoleoni - ZENIT wrote:

> Thank you for your analysis, after that I think that the problem is not the 
> nfs overhead, because the despooling phase (over nfs filsystem) has a 
> transfer rate of 7.3 MBps, so it's fine. Instead the first phase (bacula-fd 
> -> bacula-sd) happens at 1.2 MBps which is very poor value I think.

Is this a full backup?

You can't get accurate results with anything else.

       compression=GZIP # compress backup

This will have a MARKED effect on your speeds. Consider switching it off 
and see how fast things go.




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in 
Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data 
generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual
or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business 
insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>