Hi all

I'm planning a Bacula setup with ZFS on the SDs (media being disk, not tape), 
and I just wonder - should I use a smaller recordsize (aka largest block size) 
than the default setting of 128kB?

Also, last I tried, with ZFS on a test box, I enabled compression, the lzjb 
algorithm (very lightwegith and quite decent compression). For 'normal' data, I 
usually get 30%+ compression with this, but for the data backed up with bacula, 
it didn't look that good, compression being down to 3-5%. Any idea what might 
cause this?

Vennlige hilsener / Best regards

roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 97542685
roy AT karlsbakk DOT net
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
--
I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres intelligibelt. Det er 
et elementært imperativ for alle pedagoger å unngå eksessiv anvendelse av 
idiomer med fremmed opprinnelse. I de fleste tilfeller eksisterer adekvate og 
relevante synonymer på norsk.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1,  ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
Spend less time writing and  rewriting code and more time creating great
experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users