Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Storage Daemon crash backtrace

2010-06-23 15:51:00
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Storage Daemon crash backtrace
From: Robert LeBlanc <robert AT leblancnet DOT us>
To: Kern Sibbald <kern AT sibbald DOT com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:24:20 -0600
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Kern Sibbald <kern AT sibbald DOT com> wrote:
> Yes, as Martin says, SIGUSR2 is something that should be ignored.  We use it
> internally to signal between threads, and when you are running the debugger
> on Bacula, you need to tell the debugger to ignore it -- as Martin indicates,
> or most often, when I am manually debugging, I start it with "run -s -f ...".
> For more information, see the Kaboom chapter of the "Problems" manual.
>
> Of course, if Bacula sent you the traceback (or put it in your working
> directory), you should open a bug report and post it there, and we will look
> at it.
>

I had to run gdb manually (the e-mail report kept coming back empty)
and followed the notes in the manual. I did 'run -s -f ...' as the
manual said. I'll ignore SIGUSR2 and get it to crash again.

Robert LeBlanc
Life Sciences & Undergraduate Education Computer Support
Brigham Young University

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate 
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the 
lucky parental unit.  See the prize list and enter to win: 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users