> Considering "file names" loaded in RAM, I still have doubts. For instance:
> 
> 1) If Accurate=yes, and there is a new file but with old date than
> previous full/diff/inc backup, will it be backed up? Is this very old
> Windows Bacula client bug solved?

In theory, Accurate means that it should back up any file that is in any way 
different to what it was when the backup was last done. I'm not sure to what 
extent it works in practice.

> 2) Why this complex solution? Why not just consider the modified date
> + Archive bit? I know that Bacula solution addressess the
> deleted/renamed files issue, which is common to all backup programs.
> But it is an expensive (more memory) solution to the Bacula-only
> Windows-only issue: risk of not backing up a new file with older date
> than previous backup.
> 

Bacula began in a unix/posix environment. Windows support was developed later. 
You would need to ask Kern if he would accept patches which implemented the use 
of the Archive bit.

James

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users