On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 04:54:01PM -0400, John Lockard wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 04:11:55PM -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
> > >
> > > Running Jobs:
> > > JobId Level Name Status
> > > ======================================================================
> > > 11239 Increme Unix_crank-va-4.2009-03-20_15.39.55 is running
> > > 11240 Increme Unix_puffer-va-3.2009-03-20_15.39.56 is waiting on max
> > > Storage jobs
> > > 11241 Increme Unix_puffer-va-4.2009-03-20_15.39.57 is waiting on max
> > > Storage jobs
> > > 11242 Full DatabaseArchives_crank-va-3.2009-03-20_15.40.59 is
> > > waiting for higher priority jobs to finish
> > > ====
> >
> > Ok, it looks like these ran correctly after all. I'm a bit perplexed
> > why the Director reports 11242 as being lower priority, but at least it
> > worked as designed. Extracted from llist jobs:
>
> From the run-times, the job order was 11239, 11242, 11240, 11241.
> This would make sense, it just listed 11242 last, it was waiting
> for 11239 to finish, thus the "waiting for higher priority jobs"
> message.
That's a misleading message. Job 11239 had a Priority of 20. Job 11242
had a Priority of 10. I think the phrase "waiting for running jobs to
finish" would be more appropriate.
Thanks,
--
Jason Dixon
OmniTI Computer Consulting, Inc.
jdixon AT omniti DOT com
443.325.1357 x.241
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are
powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and
easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development
software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging.
Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
