On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 05:02:48AM -0700, Kevin Keane wrote:
> Jason Dixon wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 04:54:01PM -0400, John Lockard wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 04:11:55PM -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
> >>
> >>>> Running Jobs:
> >>>> JobId Level Name Status
> >>>> ======================================================================
> >>>> 11239 Increme Unix_crank-va-4.2009-03-20_15.39.55 is running
> >>>> 11240 Increme Unix_puffer-va-3.2009-03-20_15.39.56 is waiting on max
> >>>> Storage jobs
> >>>> 11241 Increme Unix_puffer-va-4.2009-03-20_15.39.57 is waiting on max
> >>>> Storage jobs
> >>>> 11242 Full DatabaseArchives_crank-va-3.2009-03-20_15.40.59 is
> >>>> waiting for higher priority jobs to finish
> >>>> ====
> >>>>
> >>> Ok, it looks like these ran correctly after all. I'm a bit perplexed
> >>> why the Director reports 11242 as being lower priority, but at least it
> >>> worked as designed. Extracted from llist jobs:
> >>>
> >> From the run-times, the job order was 11239, 11242, 11240, 11241.
> >> This would make sense, it just listed 11242 last, it was waiting
> >> for 11239 to finish, thus the "waiting for higher priority jobs"
> >> message.
> >
> > That's a misleading message. Job 11239 had a Priority of 20. Job 11242
> > had a Priority of 10. I think the phrase "waiting for running jobs to
> > finish" would be more appropriate.
> >
> What's the priority of jobs 11240 and 11241? My guess is that 11242 is
> actually waiting for those two, rather than for 11239. They, in turn,
> are waiting for 11239 due to a Max Concurrent Job.
11239-11241 are Priority = 20. 11242 is Priority = 10.
> "Waiting for running job to finish" would not be a good message, because
> you would want to know *why* it is waiting. You see that 11240 and 11241
> are also waiting for a running job to finish, just for a different reason.
It would be the *correct* message for 11242's state. Because it is NOT
waiting for higher priority jobs to finish. Why does it say that, when
this is clearly not the case?
--
Jason Dixon
OmniTI Computer Consulting, Inc.
jdixon AT omniti DOT com
443.325.1357 x.241
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are
powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and
easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development
software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging.
Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
