Jason Dixon wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 04:54:01PM -0400, John Lockard wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 04:11:55PM -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
>>
>>>> Running Jobs:
>>>> JobId Level Name Status
>>>> ======================================================================
>>>> 11239 Increme Unix_crank-va-4.2009-03-20_15.39.55 is running
>>>> 11240 Increme Unix_puffer-va-3.2009-03-20_15.39.56 is waiting on max
>>>> Storage jobs
>>>> 11241 Increme Unix_puffer-va-4.2009-03-20_15.39.57 is waiting on max
>>>> Storage jobs
>>>> 11242 Full DatabaseArchives_crank-va-3.2009-03-20_15.40.59 is
>>>> waiting for higher priority jobs to finish
>>>> ====
>>>>
>>> Ok, it looks like these ran correctly after all. I'm a bit perplexed
>>> why the Director reports 11242 as being lower priority, but at least it
>>> worked as designed. Extracted from llist jobs:
>>>
>> From the run-times, the job order was 11239, 11242, 11240, 11241.
>> This would make sense, it just listed 11242 last, it was waiting
>> for 11239 to finish, thus the "waiting for higher priority jobs"
>> message.
>>
>
> That's a misleading message. Job 11239 had a Priority of 20. Job 11242
> had a Priority of 10. I think the phrase "waiting for running jobs to
> finish" would be more appropriate.
>
What's the priority of jobs 11240 and 11241? My guess is that 11242 is
actually waiting for those two, rather than for 11239. They, in turn,
are waiting for 11239 due to a Max Concurrent Job.
"Waiting for running job to finish" would not be a good message, because
you would want to know *why* it is waiting. You see that 11240 and 11241
are also waiting for a running job to finish, just for a different reason.
--
Kevin Keane
Owner
The NetTech
Find the Uncommon: Expert Solutions for a Network You Never Have to Think About
Office: 866-642-7116
http://www.4nettech.com
This e-mail and attachments, if any, may contain confidential and/or
proprietary information. Please be advised that the unauthorized use or
disclosure of the information is strictly prohibited. The information herein is
intended only for use by the intended recipient(s) named above. If you have
received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately and
permanently delete the e-mail and any copies, printouts or attachments thereof.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are
powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and
easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development
software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging.
Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
