Bacula-users

[Bacula-users] 2.4.2 vs 2.5.16 on CentOS

2008-11-15 07:46:36
Subject: [Bacula-users] 2.4.2 vs 2.5.16 on CentOS
From: Nils Blanck-Wehde <nils.blanck-wehde AT backofficeservice DOT biz>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 13:37:10 +0100
Hi everyone!

I'm setting up a new bacula installation on CentOS 5.2.
I planned on using the FSchwarz EL5 rpms because the install very well
under CentOS 5.2
Now I am wondering whether it's worth the hassle to compile 2.5.16 from
source.
Unforunately I am not a programmer so the changelog of 2.5.16 doesn't
really tell me anything?
Maybe someone  more involved can give me a hint here?
Are there any 2.4.3 rpms that install under CentOS?

I feel a little bad installing an outdated version....

Thanks for any advise,

Nils

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>