Nils Blanck-Wehde wrote:
> Hi everyone!
> 
> I'm setting up a new bacula installation on CentOS 5.2.
> I planned on using the FSchwarz EL5 rpms because the install very well
> under CentOS 5.2
> Now I am wondering whether it's worth the hassle to compile 2.5.16 from
> source.
> Unforunately I am not a programmer so the changelog of 2.5.16 doesn't
> really tell me anything?
> Maybe someone  more involved can give me a hint here?
> Are there any 2.4.3 rpms that install under CentOS?
> 
> I feel a little bad installing an outdated version....

2.4.3 isn't outdated - it's the latest stable version.  The 2.5 branch is 
under development, so while it contains new features, it's also much more 
likely to contain new bugs, too.  Odds are you'll want to stick to the stable 
2.4 branch until the new stable branch is released, and avoid 2.5 except in a 
testing environment.

-- 
Frank Sweetser fs at wpi.edu  |  For every problem, there is a solution that
WPI Senior Network Engineer   |  is simple, elegant, and wrong. - HL Mencken
     GPG fingerprint = 6174 1257 129E 0D21 D8D4  E8A3 8E39 29E3 E2E8 8CEC

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users