Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Slow restore performance

2008-08-21 08:21:05
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Slow restore performance
From: Chris Howells <chris AT transitive DOT com>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 13:20:48 +0100
Christoph Litauer wrote:
> Ok, I'll try an answer myself: As far as I read the documentation the 
> performance gap between reading and writing results from bacula not 
> storing the exact position for each file. Instead just the job position 
> is stored in the database so that restore jobs have to read the whole 
> job data.

Bacula records the block that the file is stored in in the database, but 
yes, it does have to search in the block for the file.

-- 
Chris Howells <chris AT transitive DOT com>
SysAdmin - Transitive Ltd.
http://www.transitive.com

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>