Hemant Shah
E-mail: hjrrs AT yahoo DOT com
--- On Tue, 7/8/08, Arno Lehmann <al AT its-lehmann DOT de> wrote:
> From: Arno Lehmann <al AT its-lehmann DOT de>
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula says it is doing incremental backup but
> does full backup.
> To: "baculausers" <bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
> Date: Tuesday, July 8, 2008, 2:44 AM
> Hi,
>
> 07.07.2008 19:46, Hemant Shah wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > I ran my first production backup of bacula last
> weekend. I did a full backup to tape, then full backup to
> disk. Next was incremental backup. Bacula said that it was
> doing incremental backup but it actually did a full backup.
> I am running bacula 2.4.0. Here are the e-mails I received.
> >
> > Fullbackup:
> >
> > Build OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
> redhat
> > JobId: 39
> > Job:
> lidp11-BackupToDisk.2008-07-04_21.04.42
> > Backup Level: Full
> > Client: "lidp11-fd" 2.4.0
> (04Jun08) x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu,redhat,
> > FileSet: "lidp11 Disk set"
> 2008-07-04 21:04:05
> > Pool:
> "lidp11-FullBackupDiskPool" (From Job FullPool
> override)
> > Storage: "lidp11-File"
> (From Pool resource)
> > Scheduled time: 04-Jul-2008 21:04:01
> > Start time: 05-Jul-2008 18:14:14
> > End time: 06-Jul-2008 05:01:39
> > Elapsed time: 10 hours 47 mins 25 secs
> > Priority: 10
> > FD Files Written: 2,417,797
> > SD Files Written: 2,417,797
> > FD Bytes Written: 60,253,728,260 (60.25 GB)
> > SD Bytes Written: 60,550,530,761 (60.55 GB)
> > Rate: 1551.1 KB/s
> > Software Compression: 52.7 %
> > VSS: no
> > Storage Encryption: no
> > Volume name(s):
> Full-lidp11-2008-07-05-18:14:13
> > Volume Session Id: 39
> > Volume Session Time: 1215182293
> > Last Volume Bytes: 60,661,172,712 (60.66 GB)
> > Non-fatal FD errors: 0
> > SD Errors: 0
> > FD termination status: OK
> > SD termination status: OK
> > Termination: Backup OK
> >
> >
> > Incremental Backup:
> >
> > Build OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
> redhat
> > JobId: 70
> > Job:
> lidp11-BackupToDisk.2008-07-06_22.00.30
> > Backup Level: Incremental,
> since=2008-07-05 18:14:14
> > Client: "lidp11-fd" 2.4.0
> (04Jun08) x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu,redhat,
> > FileSet: "lidp11 Disk set"
> 2008-07-04 21:04:05
> > Pool:
> "lidp11-IncrBackupDiskPool" (From Job IncPool
> override)
> > Storage: "lidp11-File"
> (From Pool resource)
> > Scheduled time: 06-Jul-2008 22:00:00
> > Start time: 06-Jul-2008 22:05:25
> > End time: 07-Jul-2008 06:26:42
> > Elapsed time: 8 hours 21 mins 17 secs
> > Priority: 10
> > FD Files Written: 2,096,136
> > SD Files Written: 2,096,136
> > FD Bytes Written: 58,910,683,776 (58.91 GB)
> > SD Bytes Written: 59,167,747,657 (59.16 GB)
> > Rate: 1958.7 KB/s
> > Software Compression: 52.4 %
> > VSS: no
> > Storage Encryption: no
> > Volume name(s):
> Incr-lidp11-2008-07-06-22:05:25
> > Volume Session Id: 68
> > Volume Session Time: 1215182293
> > Last Volume Bytes: 59,271,542,084 (59.27 GB)
> > Non-fatal FD errors: 0
> > SD Errors: 0
> > FD termination status: OK
> > SD termination status: OK
> > Termination: Backup OK
> >
> >
> > As you can see the amount of data backups is almost
> the same (60GB).
> > This was done over a long weekend, so very few files
> changed on this filesystem.
>
> As there are some jobs between those two you reported I
> suspect there
> was another attempt to run a full backup which was
> cancelled (either
> manually or automatically) to run a backup while the first
> full was
> still active.
>
> This would have left an aborted or canceled full job in the
> catalog,
> forcing the incremental to get upgraded. Is that possible?
No, there were no aborted of canceled jobs, I have scheduled them with
different priorities so that they do not interfere with each other. If the
backup was upgraded to Full then there would have been a warning message in the
e-mail, I have seen that happen during my testing.
Here is my schedule, the tape backups run at priority 5 and disk backups run at
priority 10.
Schedule
{
Name = FullBackupToTape
Run = Level=Full Storage=DLT_Drive SpoolData=yes 1st fri at 20:00
}
Schedule
{
Name = BackupToDisk
Run = Level=Full 1st fri at 21:00
Run = Level=Incremental sun-thu at 22:00
Run = Level=Incremental 2nd fri at 22:00
Run = Level=Incremental 3rd fri at 22:00
Run = Level=Incremental 4th fri at 22:00
Run = Level=Incremental 5th fri at 22:00
Run = Level=Incremental 2nd sat at 22:00
Run = Level=Incremental 3rd sat at 22:00
Run = Level=Incremental 4th sat at 22:00
Run = Level=Incremental 5th sat at 22:00
}
Schedule
{
Name = VmwareToTape
Run = Level=Full Storage=DLT_Drive SpoolData=yes 1st fri at 21:00
}
Schedule
{
Name = VmwareToDisk
Run = Level=Full Fri at 23:00
}
>
> Arno
>
> > Hemant Shah
> > E-mail: hjrrs AT yahoo DOT com
> >
>
> --
> Arno Lehmann
> IT-Service Lehmann
> www.its-lehmann.de
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE
> NOW!
> Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open
> source project,
> along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for
> chronic lameness
> and boredom. Vote Now at
> http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
> _______________________________________________
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
