On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Shawn Carroll <shawn AT pcc DOT com> wrote:
>
>> Because I do not want to spend cpu time on ssh - And why not rsyncd
>> for local LAN. It should be done that way when encryption is not
>> needed.
>
> Does anyone choose to deal with this by simply specifying no encryption as an 
> ssh option?

I used to specify blowfish which is pretty lightweight back in pentium
III days, but really, what else does your CPU have to do during the
backup time?  You are mostly disk bound anyway -  unless maybe you are
using IDE or USB drives that need CPU for the I/O work.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
     lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/