Hi,
Les Mikesell wrote on 2011-09-07 17:46:47 -0500 [Re: [BackupPC-users] Backups
very slow after upgrade to squeeze]:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 3:10 PM, James L. Evans <jle AT techatl DOT com> wrote:
> >
> > xvda1 10GB Operating system (24% used)
> > xvdb1 536MB Swap partition
> > xvbc1 214GB backup storage (72% used)
> >
> > I'm not sure how to tell what a "fragmented VM image" would look like.
>
> Did the location or allocation change as part of the upgrade? If the
> partitions are mapped straight from the host, I wouldn't expect them
> to, but something seems to have made writing very slow. Or perhaps
> you have concurrent activity on a different VM or application that
> competes with the physical disk head location.
you did see the kjournald oops? I don't really know what to make of it, but
there is some kind of basic problem (hardware, on-disc corruption, software
incompatibility, ...). I'd look into that first, whether or not it is directly
related to the preformance issue.
Regards,
Holger
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop
What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses
from deploying virtual desktops? How do next-generation virtual desktops
provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable
virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
|