On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 3:10 PM, James L. Evans <jle AT techatl DOT com> wrote:
>
> xvda1   10GB    Operating system (24% used)
> xvdb1   536MB   Swap partition
> xvbc1   214GB   backup storage (72% used)
>
> I'm not sure how to tell what a "fragmented VM image" would look like.

Did the location or allocation change as part of the upgrade?  If the
partitions are mapped straight from the host, I wouldn't expect them
to, but something seems to have made writing very slow.  Or perhaps
you have concurrent activity on a different VM  or application that
competes with the physical disk head location.

-- 
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using storage to extend the benefits of virtualization and iSCSI
Virtualization increases hardware utilization and delivers a new level of
agility. Learn what those decisions are and how to modernize your storage 
and backup environments for virtualization.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51434361/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/