Re: The Coyote Den AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR April 10, 2009
2009-04-14 08:30:31
I committed a fix, thank for finding the bug.
CHECK-DEVICE is correct, properties are sent send to the 'support'
application command because they are not needed, the script just log the
default value.
Jean-Louis
Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
OK, after some logfile exchange off-list, I think we're onto something
here. The planner examines all DLEs to decide which incremental to
promote, and selects coyote:/root. It finishes its loop, and then
goes to attempt to promote that dump:
2792 if(dp_promote) {
2793 one_est_t *level0_est = est_for_level(dp, 0);
2794 dp = dp_promote;
Sadly, dp is NULL on line 2793. The fix is to use dp_promote instead
of dp. Jean-Louis, do you agree? If so, please commit (I'm running
off for the evening).
Also, Jean-Louis, I'm leaving the chasing-down of the CHECK-DEVICE
question to you.
Gene: thanks for working so hard on this, and my apologies if I seemed
short with you. In general, when you see something go wrong with
Amanda, it's probably best to freeze everything and get to the bottom
of it immediately.
Dustin
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
Re: Fwd: The Coyote Den AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR April 10, 2009, Jean-Louis Martineau
Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: The Coyote Den AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR April 10, 2009, Dustin J. Mitchell
- Re: The Coyote Den AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR April 10, 2009, Gene Heskett
- Re: The Coyote Den AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR April 10, 2009,
Jean-Louis Martineau <=
- Re: The Coyote Den AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR April 10, 2009, Gene Heskett
- Re: The Coyote Den AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR April 10, 2009, Gene Heskett
- Re: The Coyote Den AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR April 10, 2009, Gene Heskett
|
|
|