Le vendredi 23 mars 2007 à 22:42 -0400, Gene Heskett a écrit :
> On Friday 23 March 2007, jp.pozzi AT izzop DOT net wrote:
> >Le jeudi 22 mars 2007 à 20:13 -0400, Gene Heskett a écrit :
> >> On Thursday 22 March 2007, storm66 AT club-internet DOT fr wrote:
> >> >Hello,
> >> >
> >> >One backup partly failed with :
> >> >
> >> >FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
> >> >  k400  /mnt/d_mails  lev 1  FAILED [dumps way too big, 1025270 KB,
> >> > must skip incremental dumps]
> >> >  k400  /home/jpp     lev 1  FAILED [dumps way too big, 1116100 KB,
> >> > must skip incremental dumps]
> >> >  k400  /etc          lev 0  STRANGE
> >> >
> >> >for some other directories and machines the backup is OK.
> >> >What is the problem ?
> >> >
> >> >Regards
> >> >
> >> >Storm66
> >>
> >> Your kernel version please?
> >
> >Kernel 2.6.16 on the "master" machine, 2.6.18 and 2.6.20 on other
> >machines.
> 
> Those are clean from the effect I had in mind, except the 2.6.20.4-r1 
> recent variation of 2.6.20.
> 
> >Frank Smith asks for the size of tape I am using : it is a virtual tape
> >on a separate disk with more than 100G avalaible.
> 
> Ahh, I see.  But what did you specify the size was in your HARD-DISK 
> definition in your amanda.conf?  Even though there may 100GB available, 
> amanda still respects the size you set there, when doing the planning.

Hello,

The Amanda disk space is set to 64 Go, but Frank Smith ask me to look
at the tapesize whiwh is not set in my config (virtual tape with no
type). I will try with a tapetype.

Regards

> 
>