Re: AMANDA reports no slots, but there ARE slots!
2007-03-08 15:41:17
FL schrieb:
> Maybe I can add to it -- when I have a break.
Yeah ;) I know that definition of a date.
> I've just
> gone through the same exercise on a CentOS 4 system (I intend to upgrade
> it to RHEL 4); on that system it was necessary to run modprobe sg to see
> the devices, and the udev syntax (which I believe is the same as Fedora
> Core). Perhaps the need to run modprobe is a bug.
[...]
> Though it is still necessary to run modprobe sg
Well, I don't see the problem with this.
If sg-support isn't compiled into the kernel, but compiled as a module,
that module has to be loaded to be able to access the devices it supports.
Do I misunderstand something here?
Stefan
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: AMANDA reports no slots, but there ARE slots!, FL
- Re: AMANDA reports no slots, but there ARE slots!, Stefan G. Weichinger
- Re: AMANDA reports no slots, but there ARE slots!, FL
- Re: AMANDA reports no slots, but there ARE slots!, Stefan G. Weichinger
- Re: AMANDA reports no slots, but there ARE slots!, FL
- Re: AMANDA reports no slots, but there ARE slots!, Stefan G. Weichinger
- Re: AMANDA reports no slots, but there ARE slots!, FL
- Re: AMANDA reports no slots, but there ARE slots!,
Stefan G. Weichinger <=
- Re: AMANDA reports no slots, but there ARE slots!, FL
- Re: AMANDA reports no slots, but there ARE slots!, Gene Heskett
Re: AMANDA reports no slots, but there ARE slots!, Jon LaBadie
|
|
|