Re: AMANDA reports no slots, but there ARE slots!
2007-03-08 17:15:33
On Thursday 08 March 2007, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>FL schrieb:
>> Maybe I can add to it -- when I have a break.
>
>Yeah ;) I know that definition of a date.
>
>> I've just
>> gone through the same exercise on a CentOS 4 system (I intend to
>> upgrade it to RHEL 4); on that system it was necessary to run modprobe
>> sg to see the devices, and the udev syntax (which I believe is the
>> same as Fedora Core). Perhaps the need to run modprobe is a bug.
>
>[...]
>
>> Though it is still necessary to run modprobe sg
>
>Well, I don't see the problem with this.
>
>If sg-support isn't compiled into the kernel, but compiled as a module,
>that module has to be loaded to be able to access the devices it
> supports.
>
>Do I misunderstand something here?
>
>Stefan
The init scripts that run at bootup time should load it for the user, but
I don't know if Centos4 is that advanced yet. In that event, sticking
a 'modprobe sg' in the rc.local script might be indicated.
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Any fool can paint a picture, but it takes a wise person to be able to
sell it.
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: AMANDA reports no slots, but there ARE slots!, FL
- Re: AMANDA reports no slots, but there ARE slots!, Stefan G. Weichinger
- Re: AMANDA reports no slots, but there ARE slots!, FL
- Re: AMANDA reports no slots, but there ARE slots!, Stefan G. Weichinger
- Re: AMANDA reports no slots, but there ARE slots!, FL
- Re: AMANDA reports no slots, but there ARE slots!, Stefan G. Weichinger
- Re: AMANDA reports no slots, but there ARE slots!, FL
- Re: AMANDA reports no slots, but there ARE slots!, Stefan G. Weichinger
- Re: AMANDA reports no slots, but there ARE slots!, FL
- Re: AMANDA reports no slots, but there ARE slots!,
Gene Heskett <=
Re: AMANDA reports no slots, but there ARE slots!, Jon LaBadie
|
|
|