Amanda-Users

Re: AMANDA reports no slots, but there ARE slots!

2007-03-08 17:03:44
Subject: Re: AMANDA reports no slots, but there ARE slots!
From: FL <lengyel AT gmail DOT com>
To: sgw AT amanda DOT org
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 16:55:43 -0500


On 3/8/07, Stefan G. Weichinger <sgw AT amanda DOT org> wrote:
FL schrieb:

> Maybe I can add to it -- when I have a break.

Yeah ;) I know that definition of a date.
 
 
Well, it's more reliable and precise than setting a time subject to last minute confirmation (that translates in practice to "never").

> I've just
> gone through the same exercise on a CentOS 4 system (I intend to upgrade
> it to RHEL 4); on that system it was necessary to run modprobe sg to see
> the devices, and the udev syntax (which I believe is the same as Fedora
> Core). Perhaps the need to run modprobe is a bug.

[...]

> Though it is still necessary to run modprobe sg

Well, I don't see the problem with this.

If sg-support isn't compiled into the kernel, but compiled as a module,
that module has to be loaded to be able to access the devices it supports.

Do I misunderstand something here?

Stefan
 
 
There's nothing wrong with having to use modproble...

 
Somehow I had the impression that udev would work with modprobe--my Debian system seemed tol load the sg modules without the modprobe after my udev modification! It could have been a hallucination. Yes, you failed to understand that I was hallucinating (why not blame the victim). I didn't check if SCSI generic devices were part of the kernel--I didn't think they were. I'll check again.