Re: General backup advice help?
2006-10-20 20:36:30
Hi Jon, thanks for the reply!
Jon LaBadie wrote:
My main concern is that we have to be "up" round the clock these days as
we have people connecting during their work day, 9 hours different from
ours. So having major services disrupted in the middle of the night for
backups doesn't seem a viable solution anymore, as it hits the other
people in the middle of the day.
"Up" is less a concern to me than "connected". Are some of these
people working on laptops or other computers that are not accessible
to your backup server except at certain times?
Actually for those people the main issue is that some key services (like
the email server) are shut down during backups. This is a tangential
issue I guess because by getting smoother backups I'm just going to make
their outages shorter, but the outage will still be there. I'm not
backing up from Europe, no. So connectivity is not an issue.
If you are willing to use tar as as your backup program (many, many
amanda sites do that) then there is not problem. You say you have
basically 400GB of data. The basic unit of backup for amanda is
called a "DiskList Entry" (DLE) after the name of a config file.
With tar as the backup program you can specify directory tree's
as a DLE rather than filesystems. So you could have a DLE for
/boot, /var, /home, /usr/local, /usr (without local), /opt,
/database, and one for / without all the others. This is done
by "including" or "excluding" files and directories in the DLE
config. Now with 16 DLE's from two systems (or even more is you
wish), amanda can spread the level 0's of those 16 items over
your dumpcycle (typically a week). So on a typical day, only
2 or 3 of the DLEs will get a level 0 and on average your daily
backups will be 1/7th of your 400GB or about 60GB/day.
I have heard of this but I thought that you can only use a directory
rather than a partition for a level 0 backup. If I need daily L1
backups, is it still possible with the above scheme? If it is, then I
think thats definitely the way I will go!
Thanks again,
Don
|
|
|