Re: using disk instead of tape
2006-09-13 01:17:24
On Friday 08 September 2006 17:03, you wrote:
> A few years ago I was doing a forensics security review for a client that
> had data that needed to be erased VERY reliably. The determination was
> that because even IDE disks did remapping internally, it would be possible
> for previously written data to be inaccessible to a program writing random
> data over the whole disk several times.
Yes. Many drives provide a manufacturer-specific API that lets you force a
low-level format, but at the portable level, there is no way to ensure this.
Cheers,
--Ian
--
Zmanda: Open Source Data Protection and Archiving.
http://www.zmanda.com
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: using disk instead of tape, (continued)
- Re: using disk instead of tape, Ronan KERYELL
- Re: using disk instead of tape, Geert Uytterhoeven
- Re: using disk instead of tape, Phil Howard
- Re: using disk instead of tape,
Ian Turner <=
- Re: using disk instead of tape, Ian Turner
- Re: using disk instead of tape, Phil Howard
- Re: using disk instead of tape, Geert Uytterhoeven
- Re: using disk instead of tape, Gene Heskett
- Re: using disk instead of tape, Geert Uytterhoeven
- Re: using disk instead of tape, Gene Heskett
- Re: using disk instead of tape, Phil Howard
- Re: using disk instead of tape, Phil Howard
- Amanda vs. rsync vs. ... (was: Re: using disk instead of tape), Geert Uytterhoeven
- Re: Amanda vs. rsync vs. ... (was: Re: using disk instead of tape), Gene Heskett
|
|
|