Re: using disk instead of tape
2006-09-05 05:11:14
On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 06:39:40PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
| Phil,
| what advantage(s) do you forsee in amanda's use of raw disk
| devices as opposed to files on the native filesystem.
The ability to avoid the page cached I/O subsystem to control
performance impact on the system.
| It certainly would destroy one of amanda's features,
| the ability to easily recover backup data using
| standard unix utilities without amanda software.
How is that destroyed?
Suppose you use tar format. You can have tar read from tape directly,
which is what I presume you mean for being able to recover outside of
Amanda. You can have tar read from disk partitions if the native
partition scheme is used.
| I've not heard people on the list reporting poor performance
| in using the current scheme for saving backups on disk-based
| 'virtual tapes'. If there are, I'd like to know about it.
How could they have compared if there is none writing to raw disk now?
| Given that the backups are coming from dump or tar, possibly
| over a network, possibly processed by compression and encryption
| software, it is unlikely that the final disk writing is a bottleneck.
Certainly there will be situations where other factors affect the speed.
| Perhaps additional features would be possible. Like multiplexed
| "direct to tape" dumps without a holding disk. The current scheme
| only allows a single dump direct to tape. Multiplexed dumps have
| to go to a holding disk before being taped.
A potential project will have some very large data. Each machine can
have its own external backup drives, so for each machine it can be seen
as a single dump. It's just going to be large. Probably 400G or 800G
per machine. I'm just exploring all options and Amanda is one of them.
If I do go with a filesystem on the disks, I'll probably use rsync so
the disk is a replica and can simply substitute as is.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Phil Howard KA9WGN | http://linuxhomepage.com/ http://ham.org/ |
| (first name) at ipal.net | http://phil.ipal.org/ http://ka9wgn.ham.org/ |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: using disk instead of tape, (continued)
- Re: using disk instead of tape, Ronan KERYELL
- Re: using disk instead of tape, Geert Uytterhoeven
- Re: using disk instead of tape, Phil Howard
- Re: using disk instead of tape, Ian Turner
- Re: using disk instead of tape, Ian Turner
- Re: using disk instead of tape,
Phil Howard <=
- Re: using disk instead of tape, Geert Uytterhoeven
- Re: using disk instead of tape, Gene Heskett
- Re: using disk instead of tape, Geert Uytterhoeven
- Re: using disk instead of tape, Gene Heskett
- Re: using disk instead of tape, Phil Howard
- Re: using disk instead of tape, Phil Howard
- Amanda vs. rsync vs. ... (was: Re: using disk instead of tape), Geert Uytterhoeven
- Re: Amanda vs. rsync vs. ... (was: Re: using disk instead of tape), Gene Heskett
- Re: Amanda vs. rsync vs. ... (was: Re: using disk instead of tape), Ian Turner
- Re: Amanda vs. rsync vs. ... (was: Re: using disk instead of tape), Geert Uytterhoeven
|
|
|