Re: Amanda vs. rsync vs. ... (was: Re: using disk instead of tape)
2006-09-06 11:01:32
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Ian Turner wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 September 2006 04:23, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > So my ideal backup solution would be Amanda, with support for incrementally
> > storing backups at a remote location :-)
>
> Well, Amanda does that, via incremental backups. What it doesn't do (because
> of tool support) is incremental backups of individual files -- mostly because
> we don't have (I'm not aware of) any tool that does that.
Except that from time to time you need a level 0, which is big. Switching to
pure-incremental doesn't help, since then you (a) need to keep the initial
level 0 forever and (b) restore will be painful since you have to go throughall
incrementals.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert AT linux-m68k
DOT org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: using disk instead of tape, (continued)
- Re: using disk instead of tape, Phil Howard
- Amanda vs. rsync vs. ... (was: Re: using disk instead of tape), Geert Uytterhoeven
- Re: Amanda vs. rsync vs. ... (was: Re: using disk instead of tape), Gene Heskett
- Re: Amanda vs. rsync vs. ... (was: Re: using disk instead of tape), Ian Turner
- Re: Amanda vs. rsync vs. ... (was: Re: using disk instead of tape),
Geert Uytterhoeven <=
- Re: using disk instead of tape, Phil Howard
- Re: using disk instead of tape, Ian Turner
- Re: using disk instead of tape, Phil Howard
- Re: using disk instead of tape, Gene Heskett
- Re: using disk instead of tape, Phil Howard
- Re: using disk instead of tape, Ian Turner
- Re: using disk instead of tape, Phil Howard
Re: using disk instead of tape, Paul Bijnens
|
|
|