Amanda-Users
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: port 35280 not secure

2006-04-03 15:15:16
Subject: Re: port 35280 not secure
From: Anne Wilson <cannewilson AT tiscali.co DOT uk>
To: amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 20:11:42 +0100 
On Monday 03 April 2006 19:50, Anne Wilson wrote:
>
> Kevin said:
> amcheck is not setuid root on the source tree so it fails to bind a
> privileged port while perform host check.
>
> I've made sure now that all the /usr/local/sbin/ executables are owned
> root:disk, and amcheck is setuid.  What else needs to be setuid?
>
Changed ownership to amanda:disk, but still seeing the same errors.

Anne

Attachment: pgpsUqwr8Hqp8.pgp
Description: PGP signature

[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: port 35280 not secure, Anne Wilson
Next by Date:  Re: port 35280 not secure, Kevin Till
Previous by Thread:  Re: port 35280 not secure, Anne Wilson
Next by Thread:  Re: port 35280 not secure, Kevin Till
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]