|
tar versions (was Re: "implausibly old time stamp")
2005-05-25 12:08:35
Jon LaBadie wrote:
Perhaps no postings about the specific problem,
but lots where the response was to use 1.13.25,
1.13.19, or maybe 1.14.1. Latter one is fairly
new, so "my" jury is still out deliberating :)
BTW I had run into a restoring problem with (Debian sarge's) tar-1.14,
due to `sparse archive members'. As had been discussed on this list a
few times already, installing tar-1.15.1 fixed the problem, I could
restore from the existing archives without any problem.
Alex
--
Alexander Jolk / BUF Compagnie
tel +33-1 42 68 18 28 / fax +33-1 42 68 18 29
|
| <Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Debugging lufs vtape and amanda flushing-throtle for amanda, (continued)
- Re: Debugging lufs vtape and amanda flushing-throtle for amanda, Jon LaBadie
- Re: Debugging lufs vtape and amanda flushing-throtle for amanda, Vlad Popa
- "implausibly old time stamp", Tim Johnson J.
- Re: "implausibly old time stamp", Jon LaBadie
- Re: "implausibly old time stamp", Tim Johnson J.
- tar versions (was Re: "implausibly old time stamp"),
Alexander Jolk <=
- Re: tar versions (was Re: "implausibly old time stamp"), Eric Dantan Rzewnicki
- Re: tar versions (was Re: "implausibly old time stamp"), Alexander Jolk
- Re: tar versions (was Re: "implausibly old time stamp"), Paul Bijnens
- Re: tar versions (was Re: "implausibly old time stamp"), Jon LaBadie
- Message not available
- Re: tar versions (was Re: "implausibly old time stamp"), Paul Bijnens
- impossible nitubencio's contract, sam
- Re: impossible nitubencio's contract, Gene Heskett
- Re: Debugging lufs vtape and amanda flushing-throtle for amanda, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki
- Re: Debugging lufs vtape and amanda flushing-throtle for amanda, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki
- Re: Debugging lufs vtape and amanda flushing-throtle for amanda, Vlad Popa
|
|
|
