Amanda-Users

Re: amdump fails with badly formatted response from

2004-05-26 11:51:13
Subject: Re: amdump fails with badly formatted response from
From: Stefan Noll <s.noll AT metrix DOT de>
To: amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 17:38:10 +0200
Hallo

Paul Bijnens wrote:

Stefan Noll wrote:

The mangled name I found in log.20040525.0 but not in amdump.1


It really helps if you post that line :-) .
Debugging is difficult using paranormal means.
Is the line above/after normal?

backupserver: log.20040525.0

...
DISK planner neptun /etc
DISK planner neptun /usr/local/sbin
START planner date 20040525
INFO planner Adding new disk neptun:/var/samba/projekte/Laufende/BDS.
START taper datestamp 20040525 label metrix00074 tape 0
ERROR planner neptun: invalid reply from sendsize: `/var/samba/projojekte/Laufende/Klingelnberg 1 SIZE 60'
INFO planner Incremental of helix:/var/backup/helix bumped to level 2.
...


In amdump.1 everything looks OK.

planner: time 0.627: setting up estimates for neptun:/var/samba/projekte/Laufende/Klingelnberg neptun:/var/samba/projekte/Laufende/Klingelnberg overdue 5 days for level 0 setup_estimate: neptun:/var/samba/projekte/Laufende/Klingelnberg: command 0, options:
    last_level 1 next_level0 -5 level_days 3
    getting estimates 0 (45620) 1 (60) -1 (-1)


That's only the setup for estimate.  What does the result show?
It looks like:

planner: time 80.851: got result for host neptun disk /: 0 -> 45620K, 1 -> 60K, -1 -> -1K


I found in amdump.1 long

planner: time 1780.198: error result for host neptun disk /var/samba/projekte/Laufende/Klingelnberg: badly formatted response from neptun




What the client sent, yes, but what the server received, we don't know.


The problem is, where to look for in which file on which compute and my English ;-)