Amanda-Users

Re: amrecovering extremely slow

2004-02-06 11:42:59
Subject: Re: amrecovering extremely slow
From: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>
To: Amanda-Users <amanda-users AT amanda DOT org>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 11:40:53 -0500
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 05:25:49PM +0100, R.M. Evers wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-02-06 at 17:14, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> > 
> > Yes I think the entire dump file would have to be passed to the
> > client for extraction.  It is nice that you are using similar OS's
> > and backup programs (probably gnutar) on both tapeserver and client.
> > 
> > But suppose your tapeserver were say linux on an Intel processor
> > and the client were an HP-UX system, using vxdump/vxrestore, on
> > an HP PA-RISC processor.  There is no way the tapeserver could run
> > the restore program, it has to send the dump image to the client
> > that has the extraction program.
> 
> Jon & Stefan, thank you so much for your fast replies and clearing this
> up for me. Indeed I always use Linux and tar, forgetting some people
> actually use other stuff :-) Shame on me. From now on I will just
> recover my backups on the backupserver itself, and then transfer it to
> my workstation. Lot faster (and probably safer) that way.


Some of us, with several OS's, can't do that.
Another reason for keeping those DLE's small :))

-- 
Jon H. LaBadie                  jon AT jgcomp DOT com
 JG Computing
 4455 Province Line Road        (609) 252-0159
 Princeton, NJ  08540-4322      (609) 683-7220 (fax)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>