Re: Problem with amflush
2004-02-05 07:45:40
On Thursday 05 February 2004 00:59, Rohit wrote:
>> OK, please take that to the next logical step.
>>
>> Amanda is telling you you have "cruft directories" as well
>> as "apparently good amanda directories". Is there anything
>> in those directories? Perhaps your apparently good directories
>> also contain "cruft", and only cruft *** .
>>
>> At the end of an amdump run amanda tries to remove the directory
>> it was using. It "should" have already removed all files from
>> those directories so a basic "rmdir" type remove should work.
>> But if any "cruft" is left behind, the "rmdir" action will not
>> remove the directory and it will "look like" there is still
>> something needing flushing.
>
>I just checked all the directories begining with 2004* in the
> holding disk and yes all of them have amanda backup dumps in them.
>
>There is one more non amanda directory called "windows". I use this
>directory to backup windows servers [non amanda backup process -
> manual]
>
>Thanks!
I *think* that would be considered a cruft directory by amanda. Amanda
expects to have total control over its holding disk area, so I think
I'd move that one out off amanda's playpen. That might solve your
problems, given enough flush time and tapes.
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
99.22% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2004 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Problem with amflush, (continued)
- Re: Problem with amflush, Christoph Scheeder
- Re: Problem with amflush, Stefan G. Weichinger
- Re: Problem with amflush, Paul Bijnens
- Re: Problem with amflush, Rohit
- Re: Problem with amflush, Paul Bijnens
- Re: Problem with amflush, Jon LaBadie
- Re: Problem with amflush, Rohit
- Re: Problem with amflush,
Gene Heskett <=
- Re: Problem with amflush, Paul Bijnens
- Re: Problem with amflush, Rohit
- Re: Problem with amflush, Rohit
- Re: Problem with amflush, Stefan G. Weichinger
- Re: Problem with amflush, Rohit
- Re: Problem with amflush, Paul Bijnens
- Re: Problem with amflush, Stefan G. Weichinger
|
|
|