Amanda-Users

Re: amanda server on sco 5.0.6

2003-12-23 11:58:06
Subject: Re: amanda server on sco 5.0.6
From: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett AT verizon DOT net>
To: "Kurt Yoder" <kylist AT shcorp DOT com>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 11:53:43 -0500
On Tuesday 23 December 2003 11:01, Kurt Yoder wrote:
>Gene Heskett said:
>
><snipped>
>
>>>So if amlable is having trouble with this line, but this line
>>>appears syntactically correct and doesn't cause warnings for
>>>amcheck, doesn't it indicate some sort of trouble with my compiled
>>>amlabel? Could commenting out changer-src have caused this? Or is
>>> it
>>>something else?
>>
>> Is there a missmatch between the system end of line convention,
>> like one is expecting a crlf and the other is lf only?
>
>There shouldn't be. They're both Unix. Also, if there were a
>mismatch, wouldn't amcheck complain about it?

I'd certainly think so Kurt.  Maybe it does have something to do with 
commenting out the changer-src stuffs.  Browseing the amlabel srcs 
might be informative.  But you knew that, and I'm just prattling. :)

-- 
Cheers, Gene
AMD K6-III@500mhz 320M
Athlon1600XP@1400mhz  512M
99.22% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2003 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.