Re: amanda server on sco 5.0.6
2003-12-23 11:58:06
On Tuesday 23 December 2003 11:01, Kurt Yoder wrote:
>Gene Heskett said:
>
><snipped>
>
>>>So if amlable is having trouble with this line, but this line
>>>appears syntactically correct and doesn't cause warnings for
>>>amcheck, doesn't it indicate some sort of trouble with my compiled
>>>amlabel? Could commenting out changer-src have caused this? Or is
>>> it
>>>something else?
>>
>> Is there a missmatch between the system end of line convention,
>> like one is expecting a crlf and the other is lf only?
>
>There shouldn't be. They're both Unix. Also, if there were a
>mismatch, wouldn't amcheck complain about it?
I'd certainly think so Kurt. Maybe it does have something to do with
commenting out the changer-src stuffs. Browseing the amlabel srcs
might be informative. But you knew that, and I'm just prattling. :)
--
Cheers, Gene
AMD K6-III@500mhz 320M
Athlon1600XP@1400mhz 512M
99.22% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2003 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
|
|
|