On Tuesday 23 December 2003 08:53, Kurt Yoder wrote:
>Eric Siegerman said:
>
><snipped>
>
>>> Can I just remove all references to changer-src from the
>>> configure script? I don't need a tape changer. Would I break
>>> amanda-server if
>>> I tried to compile without changer-src?
>>
>> Not sure; try it and see...
>
>OK, removed all from configure, did make clean, re-ran configure,
>ran make. Everything compiles OK. I installed everything on another
>SCO 5.0.6 machine. I add the folders and config files that the
>amanda server and client look for. amcheck runs OK, so I try to run
>"amlabel REDailySet1 REDS1tape01". Now I get a whole bunch of errors
>like:
>
>"/usr/local/etc/amanda/REDailySet1/amanda.conf", line 1:
>configuration keyword expected
>"/usr/local/etc/amanda/REDailySet1/amanda.conf", line 1: end of line
>expected
>"/usr/local/etc/amanda/REDailySet1/amanda.conf", line 2:
>configuration keyword expected
>"/usr/local/etc/amanda/REDailySet1/amanda.conf", line 2: end of line
>expected
>
>
>for every line in the config file. I'm guessing the amanda.conf is
>fine, because I copied it from a working configuration on Linux and
>only changed a few specifics. Line 1 should be OK:
>
>org "Regency DailySet1"
>
>So if amlable is having trouble with this line, but this line
>appears syntactically correct and doesn't cause warnings for
>amcheck, doesn't it indicate some sort of trouble with my compiled
>amlabel? Could commenting out changer-src have caused this? Or is it
>something else?

Is there a missmatch between the system end of line convention, like 
one is expecting a crlf and the other is lf only?

-- 
Cheers, Gene
AMD K6-III@500mhz 320M
Athlon1600XP@1400mhz  512M
99.22% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2003 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.