Hardware problems have been eliminated?  I once had a nic that failed
only during heavy loads.



On Mon, 2003-05-19 at 07:59, Rebecca Pakish Crum wrote:
> Okay, this is getting ridiculous. A couple of weeks ago this client was
> FINE. I now have etimeout set to 1800 and dtimeout set to 1800. I'm
> still getting:
> sending ack:
> ----
> Amanda 2.4 ACK HANDLE 002-A0AB0708 SEQ 1053160202
> ----
> 
> bsd security: remote host web.isymmetrics.com user amanda local user
> amanda
> amandahosts security check passed
> amandad: running service "/usr/local/libexec/sendsize"
> amandad: sending REP packet:
> ----
> Amanda 2.4 REP HANDLE 002-A0AB0708 SEQ 1053160202
> OPTIONS maxdumps=1;
> / 0 SIZE 5469830
> / 1 SIZE 622920
> / 2 SIZE 412490
> ----
> 
> amandad: dgram_recv: timeout after 10 seconds
> amandad: waiting for ack: timeout, retrying
> amandad: dgram_recv: timeout after 10 seconds
> amandad: waiting for ack: timeout, retrying
> amandad: dgram_recv: timeout after 10 seconds
> amandad: waiting for ack: timeout, retrying
> amandad: dgram_recv: timeout after 10 seconds
> amandad: waiting for ack: timeout, retrying
> amandad: dgram_recv: timeout after 10 seconds
> amandad: waiting for ack: timeout, giving up!
> amandad: pid 5432 finish time Sat May 17 02:28:50 2003
> 
> I really need to get a backup on this box...should I just keep bumping
> this numbers up and see what happens? That seems a bit hit or miss. I
> can't imagine what would happen to my job if that box crashes and I have
> no backups for two weeks!
> 
> PLEASE HELP.
> 
> Rebecca A. Crum  
> Systems Administrator 
> Unterberg & Associates, P.C. 
> (219) 736-5579 ext. 184 
> 
>