Re: [ADSM-L] TSM troubles

Subject:	Re: [ADSM-L] TSM troubles
From:	Stef Coene <stef.coene AT DOCUM DOT ORG>
To:	ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date:	Fri, 11 Dec 2015 11:52:36 +0100

On Friday 11 December 2015 10:22:55 you wrote:
> 16 Power8 cores(at least 3.42 GHz) and 192 GB to handle 1000 TB of backup
> data? One would think there was a potential for code efficiency improvement.
I have a copy of our production TSM running on a standby TSM server.
I remove almost all filespace data (don't ask why) and DB2 (not dsmserv
process) is constantly eating 2 a 3 Power7 CPU's.
And I have no idea why.........


Stef

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[ADSM-L] TSM troubles, Stef Coene Re: [ADSM-L] TSM troubles, Matthew McGeary Re: [ADSM-L] TSM troubles, Stef Coene Re: [ADSM-L] TSM troubles, Nixon, Charles D. (David) Re: [ADSM-L] TSM troubles, Andrew Carlson Re: [ADSM-L] TSM troubles, Nixon, Charles D. (David) Re: [ADSM-L] TSM troubles, Andrew Carlson Re: [ADSM-L] TSM troubles, Hans Christian Riksheim Re: [ADSM-L] TSM troubles, Stef Coene <= Re: [ADSM-L] TSM troubles, Krzysztof Przygoda Re: [ADSM-L] TSM troubles, Stef Coene

Previous by Date:	Re: [ADSM-L] TSM troubles, Hans Christian Riksheim
Next by Date:	Re: [ADSM-L] TSM troubles, Krzysztof Przygoda
Previous by Thread:	Re: [ADSM-L] TSM troubles, Hans Christian Riksheim
Next by Thread:	Re: [ADSM-L] TSM troubles, Krzysztof Przygoda
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]