ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] 3494 library questions

2011-12-14 11:08:29
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] 3494 library questions
From: Steven Langdale <steven.langdale AT GMAIL DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 15:51:04 +0000
Hello Daniel

Yes, you are 100% right.

I suppose I was coming from the position that Gary already had most of it
setup for a TSM library managing config, as the existing instances appear
to be managing a library each.

As is often the case, there are multiple ways to achieve the desired
results.  Which is one if the benefits of this list :)

Thanks

Steven

On 14 December 2011 15:07, Daniel Sparrman <daniel.sparrman AT exist DOT se> 
wrote:

> Hi Steven
>
> A TSM library manager isnt mandatory in a 3494 library environment. If the
> libraries are partitioned, he can just connect his two hosts to each
> library and assign access through the 3494 CU.
>
> Which is simplest is just a matter of how the existing environment looks.
> If the libraries are already partitioned for the two hosts, no TSM library
> manager is needed, just make an entry for each library in the ibmatl.conf
> and assign access in the 3494 CU.
>
> if the libraries are not partitioned, and there is limited 3494 competence
> on-site, perhaps TSM library sharing is the way to go. It all depends on
> Gary's requirements (like, can we share volumes between the two TSM
> servers, or do they need to be divided).
>
> Best Regards
>
> Daniel Sparrman
>
>
> Daniel Sparrman
> Exist i Stockholm AB
> Växel: 08-754 98 00
> Fax: 08-754 97 30
> daniel.sparrman AT exist DOT se
> http://www.existgruppen.se
> Posthusgatan 1 761 30 NORRTÄLJE
>
> -----"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> skrev: -----
> Till: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Från: Steven Langdale
> Sänt av: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
> Datum: 12/14/2011 15:39
> Ärende: Re: [ADSM-L] 3494 library questions
>
> Gary
>
> A library manager is mandatory to coordinate library access.  Than can be a
> standalone instance or the existing instance that has exclusive access (the
> latter being the easier option with an environment of this size)
>
> Thanks
>
> Steven
>
> On 14 December 2011 14:22, Lee, Gary D. <GLEE AT bsu DOT edu> wrote:
>
> > I have two 3494 libraries at different locations.
> > I would like to have both defined to both of my tsm servers.
> >
> > Is it possible to define two libraries in the ibmatl.conf file, and if
> so,
> > how to define them to tsm?
> >
> > If not, am I correct that the other option is to share the libraries as
> > necessary defining appropriate tsm servers as library managers?
> >
> > Thanks for the assistance.
> >
> >
> >
> > Gary Lee
> > Senior System Programmer
> > Ball State University
> > phone: 765-285-1310
> >
> >
>