Re: Collocation
2000-02-16 21:11:42
At 11:21 AM 2/16/2000 -0500, you wrote:
>maxscratch of 320 here would be way uncool. Can you imagine mounting
>nearly all of these tapes everyday for migration, and then again for
>backup storage pool?! 600-some-odd mounts!
That's what robots are good for. The alternative of mounting potentially
dozens of tapes for a restore is even less attractive, IMHO. If you have a
sufficiently large disk storage pool in front of your tape storage pool,
this will reduce the number of required tape mounts, assuming that you
don't migrate the disk stgpool all the way down to 0%.
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Collocation, Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
- Re: Collocation, Paul Zarnowski
- Re: Collocation, Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
- Re: Collocation, Steven P Roder
- Re: Collocation, Nick Cassimatis
- Re: Collocation, Bill Colwell
- Re: Collocation,
Paul Zarnowski <=
- Re: Collocation, Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
- Re: Collocation, Steven P Roder
- Re: Collocation, Bill Colwell
- Re: Collocation, Bill Colwell
- Re: Collocation, Paul Zarnowski
- Re: Collocation, Joe Faracchio
- Re: Collocation, Paul Zarnowski
- Re: Collocation, Paul Zarnowski [mailto:vkm
- Re: Collocation, Bill Colwell [mailto:bcolwell
|
|
|