ADSM-L

Re: Server Detected error

1998-09-03 18:03:43
Subject: Re: Server Detected error
From: Larry Sanders <sanders AT SHOWME.MISSOURI DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1998 17:03:43 -0500
I had a lot of trouble with this same problem on our AIX server after
migrating to V3 in June.  The APAR number for the AIX server is IX80796.
I was told that the fix should be in the next AIX server PTF, maybe in
September.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Larry Sanders                         Email:  cclrs AT showme.missouri DOT edu
Larry Sanders                         Email:  cclrs AT showme.missouri DOT edu
Information and Access                Phone:  573 882-6002
     Technology Services
University of Missouri - Columbia
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Wed, 2 Sep 1998, Rejean Larivee wrote:
On Wed, 2 Sep 1998, Rejean Larivee wrote:

> Hello,
> well, your theory sounds right for apar PQ18693 (MVS server)
> but the problem exixts for other server platforms as well.
> What happens is that the same tape gets reselected again at EOV.
> What you would see in the activity log would be ANR5321I followed
> by ANR0530W.
> There is no official fix for this yet. It should be fixed in the next level
> of the server to come out soon. For now, you can turn collocation off
> temporarily until ADSM selects another volume for this client and you
> can then turn collocation back on after.
> Good day !
>
> Rejean Larivee
> ADSM Level 2 Support
>
>
>
> > I have the same problem with some HP-UX clients.. It seems to occur when my
> > disk pool is 100% full and data is migrating to tape.. I can restart the
> >
> > I have been seeing the following error a lot since we upgraded to Version 3
> > and beyond (currently, we are running 3.1.1.5 server level) The error is:
> >
> >         ANS1301E Server detected system error
>
> I see a lot of these too for unix clients.  It appears to me that they
> occur when the client is backing up directly to tape, and the tape hits
> EOT.  Rather than close out that tape, and grab another, the backup fails.
> Then, when migration fills that tape, and the client gets a new tape
> (colocation), the next backup completes successfully.  I have not
> reported this to IBM, as I have been busy persuing other ADSM defects, and
> this is only my theory.
>
> Steve (unVMix Systems Programmer/Dude) Roder
> (tkssteve AT ubvm.cc.buffalo DOT edu | tkssteve AT acsu.buffalo DOT edu | 
> (716)645-3564 ,
>    | http://ubvm.cc.buffalo.edu/~tkssteve)
>
>
>
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>