Networker

Re: [Networker] Re-labeling versus recycling?

2003-05-01 13:01:07
Subject: Re: [Networker] Re-labeling versus recycling?
From: Davina Treiber <treiber AT HOTPOP DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 13:01:05 -0400
On Thu, 1 May 2003 12:24:00 -0400, Marc Levitan <marc.levitan AT PFPC DOT COM>
wrote:

>To the best of my knowledge, the tape will be over written if:
>
> all of the savesets on the tape are recyclable.
>This gets into dependencies on other savesets and other issues that have
>been discussed on this list in the past...

Correct.

>Also, if the tape stays in the same pool, as the savesets expire, new
>savesets will append.

No this does not happen. Expiring save sets do not clear any space on the
tape. How could this happen? NetWorker would have to cleverly interleave
the new data between the old data - highly risky.

>So... if it remains in the same pool it will be appendable, if it is moved
>to a new pool it will be overwritten.
>
>**** Anyone, please correct me if I am wrong!

Sadly you are - at least partly.

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=