Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Multiple Storage (and Director) Daemons

2011-05-13 01:59:13
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Multiple Storage (and Director) Daemons
From: Radosław Korzeniewski <radoslaw AT korzeniewski DOT net>
To: Mike Seda <maseda AT stanford DOT edu>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 07:55:50 +0200
Hi,

2011/5/12 Mike Seda <maseda AT stanford DOT edu>
Hi All,
I'm currently attempting to architect a Bacula solution for an
environment of 100+ clients with 15+ TB of total data (5,000,000+ files).

During my research on the above solution, I read that it's possible to
run multiple storage (and director) daemons. This was very interesting
to me, but I'm just wondering what the reasons would be for doing so.


The main reason would be a scalability, tiering or network/site architecture.
You can scale up your backup bandwidth by adding more storage daemons and splitting clients into a separated groups.
If you have different backup media (disks, tape libraries) connected into different servers then you can use all of them with more storage daemons.
You can have a very restricted environment - dmz, remote sites, etc. so you will deploy more storage daemons to serve all your needs.


Thanks In Advance,

You welcome.

Radek

--
Radosław Korzeniewski
radoslaw AT korzeniewski DOT net
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability
What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know.
Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools
to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>