Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] RPM on CentOS

2010-09-21 14:26:23
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] RPM on CentOS
From: "Syn, Joonho" <joonho AT a9 DOT com>
To: Martin Simmons <martin AT lispworks DOT com>, "bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net" <bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:22:58 -0700
Thanks I actually ended up figuring this out myself.  Turns out there is
also a bug in the bacula-mtx spec file.  That one is missing
"%storage-daemon-user bacula"
 

On 9/21/10 6:28 AM, "Martin Simmons" <martin AT lispworks DOT com> wrote:

>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 10:33:47 -0700, Syn, Joonho said:
>> 
>> for the bacula-bat srpm i tried using
>> 
>> $ rpmbuild --rebuild --define build_centos5 1 --define build_mysql 1
>>bacula-bat-5.0.3-1.src.rpm
>> 
>> and the package would build correctly but when i installed it with
>> $ rpm-ivh "package name
>> 
>> i got a couple weird errors:
>> fg: no job control, and the other one about adding the group bacula.
>> 
>> Can i safely ignore those?
>
>I think so, as long as you have also installed the bacula-client rpm.
>
>They are caused by a bug in the bacula-bat spec file.  You can probably
>work
>around it by adding
>
>--define group_file /etc/group
>
>to the rpmbuild command line.
>
>__Martin
>
>
>> 
>> 
>> On Sep 15, 2010, at 7:16 AM, Machiel van Veen wrote:
>> 
>> > On Wednesday 15 September 2010 04:05:29 pm Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> >>> sudo rpmbuild -bb --define build_postgresql=1 --define
>>"build_centos5 1"
>> >>> -- define rhel_version=501 bacula.spec
>> >> 
>> >> Not only do you not need to unpack the srpm to get the the spec to
>>build
>> >> from But you shouldn't at all build as root?
>> >> 
>> >> Use a buidroot [1]:
>> >> $ rpmbuild --rebuild --define build_centos5=1 --define build_mysql=1
>> >> bacula-5.0.3-1.src.rpm Etc...
>> >> 
>> >> Jlc
>> > 
>> > Yeah, you're right, the sudo should not be needed. I always install
>>the source 
>> > rpm "rpm -ivh bacula-5.0.3-1.src.rpm" and the check the spec manually
>>and 
>> > such, then build.
>> > 
>> > Either way works, good to mention this.
>> > 
>> > Regards, Machiel.
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>-----
>> > Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
>> > and start using them to simplify application deployment and
>> > accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
>> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Bacula-users mailing list
>> > Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>-----
>> Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
>> and start using them to simplify application deployment and
>> accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bacula-users mailing list
>> Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>> 
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>----
>Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
>and start using them to simplify application deployment and
>accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
>http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
>_______________________________________________
>Bacula-users mailing list
>Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>