Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.0.3 backport for debian lenny?
2010-09-15 04:32:01
On 14/09/10, Tobias Brink (tobias.brink AT gmail DOT com) wrote:
> You should also be careful with the 5.0.2-1 version if you use
> Postgres: it broke my database on upgrade. This is fixed in 5.0.2-2
> which is not (yet?) in the backports. See also
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=591293 which seems to
> include a workaround.
You can deal with the problem by dropping the file_jpfid_idx index prior
to the upgrade. You will not lose any data if you do this and have to
revert to your pre-upgrade database, although it would be wise to
recreate the index as file-related sql queries will be dramatically
slower!
As John Goerzen notes in Tobias' linked bug report, one can recreate the
index as follows:
CREATE INDEX file_jpfid_idx on file (jobid, pathid, filenameid);
--
Rory Campbell-Lange
rory AT campbell-lange DOT net
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
|
|